helianlingzi

Ockey argues that Computer based testing has failed to realize its anticipated potential. Describe and discuss on his reasons for his view, and tell why you either agree or disagree with him.
In spite of the challenges in developing effective CBT systems, CBT undoubtedly bring convenience for assessors and learners. I think it is a remarkable development in the area of second language teaching and learning. We can not say that CBT failed realize its anticipated potential although the existing challenges in using it. In addition, some challenges do not only exit in CBT, but also can be seen in paper-tests. For example, paper-test also have these problems such as psychometric assumptions, local independence, controversy over appropriate scoring algorithm, agreement on test administration, practical use of test bank, and test security. Furthermore, the tests in other disciplines also face these problems.

Cummins & Davesne offer an alternative to CBT with electronic portfolios. Comment on some of the ideas from this article that you'd be interested in trying out in your own classroom.
The first part of EPs, language passport, can help teacher know about the experience of the students learning. If someone would like share his experience with others, the audience can learn successful models.
I think self-assessment is very important for learners. Therefore, the second part, language biography, gives students opportunities to evaluate their levels with detailed guidelines. This part also help teacher know about in which aspects the students need helps.
I like share the samples that students provided. The audio files, video files, personal Web sites, photos, and movies they use to record their learning competence, are more interesting and lively than the test scores. And these materials always reflect the integrated abilities of listening, speaking, and their intercultural competence.